SEOAgent automates the repetitive half of on-page SEO — titles, meta descriptions, schema, internal links, alt text — as real edits in your repo. Every change arrives as a diff you approve, so automation never publishes behind your back.
The work is genuinely repetitive. The tools that automate it usually break something else.
Most automation rewrites titles and meta descriptions from the page text alone, with no idea which queries the page already ranks for. You get changes that read well and rank worse.
Unattended optimization edits live pages before anyone reads the change. By the time you notice a wrong claim or a mangled title, it is already indexed.
Dashboard tools change the rendered page, not the source. The next deploy overwrites the work, so the same fixes get reapplied forever and drift from what is in git.
Automate the mechanical work. Keep the judgement, and keep the approval step.
The Skill runs inside Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex and edits the actual files your build reads — frontmatter, head templates, JSON-LD components. The change survives your next deploy because it is in git.
Orphan pages and thin internal linking are the highest-leverage automated fix on most sites. SEOAgent maps what links to what, then proposes contextual links from the pages that actually carry authority.
The optional cloud layer reads your Google Search Console performance per page and prioritises by impressions, CTR, and position — so optimization targets the queries a page already surfaces for instead of the ones a tool assumed.
Every optimization arrives as a change you read, edit, or reject
Edits land in source files, not in a layer bolted onto the rendered page
Search Console data decides what to optimize first, not a generic checklist
It is software that performs repetitive on-page SEO work for you — writing or rewriting meta titles and descriptions, adding schema markup, generating image alt text, fixing heading structure, and proposing internal links. The useful versions do this against evidence about how the page currently performs. The risky versions apply changes to live pages with no review.
Automate the mechanical and repetitive: alt text, schema blocks, canonical tags, internal-link discovery, and finding pages whose metadata is missing or duplicated. Keep humans on anything that makes a claim — product facts, pricing, positioning, and the decision about which topics are worth targeting at all.
No. SEOAgent proposes changes as diffs in your repository. You review, edit, and merge them, and they deploy through your normal pipeline. There is no mode where it edits your live site without an approved commit.
A plugin or dashboard usually modifies the rendered output or stores overrides in its own database, so your source of truth and your SEO drift apart. SEOAgent edits the source files themselves, which means the change is versioned, reviewable, revertible, and survives redeploys.
No. The Skill and the local CLI are free, need no account, and handle auditing plus the on-page edits. The $49 per site·month cloud layer adds Google Search Console analysis, competitor and keyword research, and evidence-backed prioritisation — it tells you which pages to optimize first.
It can, if it rewrites pages that are already working or publishes unreviewed changes at scale. That is the main argument for a review step. Optimizing a page that ranks at position 8 needs more care than filling in metadata on a page with none — which is why prioritisation from real performance data matters more than the volume of changes made.
Install the free SEOAgent Skill for Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex and audit your site in minutes. Add cloud Pro at $49 per site·mo when you want Search Console evidence behind every suggestion.
Install the Skill — free